Skip to main content

Death from above – Russian ad hoc top attack defenses

T-72B3 tanks with crude top armor cages


The recent Russian tank upgrade programs and the ever slower moving T-14 Armata saga, have all had significant portion of the efforts put into improving the survivability of the tank and its crew. Both static and explosive reactive armor (ERA) have been upgraded and small amount of the latest T-90M and T-72B3 tanks have active protection systems that may be able to defeat most of the anti-tank missiles and slower moving HEAT shells.


Environmentally friendly T-90M


While these programs have put some emphasis on the armor on the top of the turret, the main focus has been in the sides and the front of the hull and turret. Additional ERA elements have been mounted on the skirts of the vehicles and slat-cage type standoff armor has been attached into the rear sides of the turrets and hulls.


These modifications however have very little effect on direct top attacks by modern anti-tank missiles such as the American Javelin, that is also in the Ukrainian inventory. Another, more recent, threat to the turret tops has been the proliferation of armed UAVs capable of delivering rather light weight, but extremely accurate, munitions directly to tanks, even when they are placed behind traditional obstacles.


The combination of Turkish Bayraktar TB-2 drones and MAM-L and other precision munitions proved somewhat devastating in the recent Azeri offensive against Armenian forces in Nagorno-Karabakh. Russia had a front row seat in this conflict and it has had a full access to the Armenian losses and battle damage suffered by the Armenian vehicles.


Ukrainian Air Force TB-2 with MAM-L under the wings

In the recent weeks several of the Russian Southern Military District units have been spotted with a variety of standoff armor solutions on top of their T-72 series tanks. Some of the armor kits seem rather refined with what looks like an set of small sandbags mounted on a light weight frame.


T-72B3 obr 2016 with additional armor on turret top and soft ERA bag elements on the skirts


Other armor kits look like they were constructed by the company level maintenance crews from the materials they found or managed to source from a local steel vendor. Unpainted RHS frames roughly welded into the turret sides and slat armor made of flat steel bars placed between the frames. While crude, the system looks reasonably effective.


Crude, in unit made top armor.

The fact that the Russian armored forces are welding additional armor into their tanks on unit level, rather than supplying the units with factory manufactured and easily removable kits via the normal procurement channels reveals that the additional top attack protection is an urgent requirement.

A lot of additional slat-armor kits have been used in Syria and Libya, but they have always been aimed more against RPG and ATGM attacks from the sides than from above.


Syrian slightly up armored T-55

Ukraine is currently procuring the TB-2 from Turkey and that sort of a deal and a Russian plan to use their armor against Ukraine might explain the urgency. And while Russia is updating its front line units with these additional defenses, it’s unlikely that they will need them for very long as they are capable of rapidly grinding through any adversary’s smart munitions stocks with the sheer weight of their armored forces. 

Attrition still matters.


-Petri Mäkelä

@pmakela1

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Quick guide to identifying the Russian tanks Part 1: main platforms and T-72 variants

As most of the western nations have reduced their inventories to a few or mostly one type of main battle tank model in their active inventories, the myriad of tank platforms and distinct versions employed by the Russian armed forces may feel overwhelming. Here is a quick guide to identifying Russian MBTs. When you come across an image (or the actual thing), follow the steps to identify it properly. Family of the tank Russian Armed Forces currently operates, or at least storage, the following tank platforms/families: -           T-55 (<2000 in storage) -           T-62 (2000 in storage) -           T-64 (2000 in storage) -           T-72 (2000 active duty, 8000 in storage) -           T-80 (2000 active duty, 5000 in storage) -           T-90 (350 active duty, 600  in storage) -           T-14 (20 in field testing) So how can you identify what type of a tank are you looking at? There are two features that can be used to distingu

The Hammer and the Sickle - Potential Russian Pincer-Offensive

For the past weeks the social media has been filled with sightings of Russian troops moving towards the regions bordering Ukraine. The buildup was initially called an exercise, but in the most recent press releases Kremlin has been rather clear that the troops have been deployed there as an operational deployment, if Russia feels a need to act upon any real or imaginary escalation in Donbass. The troops will stay in the region as long as President Putin sees it necessary. Russia Serna-Class landing crafts of the Caspian flotilla The initial buildup was focused on occupied Crimea that has so far received an additional VDV airborne regiment, multiple mechanized battalion tactical groups and heavy artillery units equipped with at least the enormous 240mm 2S4 Tulpan mortars.  Additional trains and convoys have been spotted in Rostov, Krasnodar and Voronezh regions. The Russian controlled Belarusian military has also been alerted and multiple, very Russian looking units are operating in the

Energy deal ties Finland to the Russian Nord Stream 2

A Finnish energy company Fortum has been negotiating with the German E.ON to buy a German energy company called Uniper. The deal has been controversial in Finland as it would include a large number of coal fired power plants that do not fit the Fortum’s strategy of becoming a sustainable and green energy producer. As 50,8 % of Fortum is owned by the Finnish government, the deal has an obvious political angle. (Photo: Nord Stream) The most disturbing aspect of the deal is that Uniper owns a 950 Million € share of the Russo-German gas pipeline project Nord Stream 2 . The Finnish minister responsible for directing the state owned companies is the Center Party’s Mika Lintilä. He stated that he didn’t have any information about the Uniper’s share of the gas pipeline. He also stated that the Finnish government would not veto the deal even if it would link Finland to the controversial pipeline and Russian geopolitical interests. Finland, unlike the Baltic States and Sweden,