Skip to main content

The End of the Winter War: Sacrifice Instead of Genocide


By the beginning of the March 1940 the Finnish leadership knew that the end was near. Both frontline troops and logistics were on the brink of a collapse. Standing alone against the Soviet giant was impossible without reinforcements and supplies from abroad. The massed assaults by tanks and infantry were preceded by artillery barrages on the scale of the WW1 western front that simply turned all defensive positions into gravel.

A memorial service that was held on May 1940 for the 26 000 fallen Finns

 The Soviet demands for a peace treaty were staggering. Finland was expected to hand over the homes of 400 000 of its citizens, including the second largest city Viipuri. The new border would also be much more difficult to defend in the future and the USSR would get a naval base in Hanko at the South Western coast.

The western allies kept promising help through Norway and Sweden, but both nations refused to allow troops to transit. While Finland used the Western support as a bargaining chip, the Finnish government never fully relied on the sincerity of the help offerings. The Finnish reservations turned out to be correct as it has been later revealed that the allied plan would have actually concentrated on taking over the iron ore mines in Norway and Sweden and very small elements, if any, of the expeditionary force would have reached Finland.

Bombed out city of Viipuri

For Finland the stakes were the highest they could have been. The Soviet occupation would be the end of the Finnish nation and the Finnish leaders were aware of the risks. The Soviets had conducted extensive purges, that would today be classified as a genocide, of the Finnish, Ingrian and Karelian people in the late 1930’s. 30 000 Finns and 50 000 Ingrians were murdered by the Soviet regime as potential threats. These victims include thousands of Finnish communists that moved from the USA to the USSR in search of a worker’s paradise.

The Finnish head negotiator in the ceasefire talks in Moscow, Paasikivi, stated that the threat to the Finnish people was existential. The members of the academia, army and Suojeluskunta-militia would be executed, just as their Polish counterparts were slaughtered in the Katyn forest by the Soviet NKVD. Rest of the people would be either deported into Siberia or bolshevized in Finland. As the Finnish resistance had been humiliating to the Soviets the retribution after an occupation was expected to be far more brutal than the heinous crimes committed in the Baltics and Poland.

The Finnish peace negotiators balanced on a razor wire. They managed to retain an independent state by playing the Soviet fears of Allied intervention and looming war with Germany to reach an outcome that allowed an independent Finland to resettle its internally displaced population, rebuild the damaged infrastructure, rearm the defense forces and prepare to retake the lost lands, should an opportunity present itself.

Finnish patrol after a fight in the Arctic wilderness

 The former United States Secretary of Defense James Mattis summed up the lessons of the Winter War in three points.

-          The combination of mobility, successful intelligence and local knowledge lay the foundation for any successful operation

-         -The technological advantage and numbers will not guarantee victory if the training of the troops is poor and the leadership is rigid and unable to improvise.

-          The rewriting of history by the states like Russia show that they are willing to use force to capitalize on any failures of deterrence.

Winter War was a tragedy, that built legends of courage and in the end the struggle allowed a small nation to survive and thrive instead of fading into the footnotes of history.

-Petri Mäkelä
-------

Sources:
Teemu Keskisarjan kolumni: Talvisodan lopussa Suomi pelastautui kansanmurhalta
https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandarmoh

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Quick guide to identifying the Russian tanks Part 1: main platforms and T-72 variants

As most of the western nations have reduced their inventories to a few or mostly one type of main battle tank model in their active inventories, the myriad of tank platforms and distinct versions employed by the Russian armed forces may feel overwhelming. Here is a quick guide to identifying Russian MBTs. When you come across an image (or the actual thing), follow the steps to identify it properly. Family of the tank Russian Armed Forces currently operates, or at least storage, the following tank platforms/families: -           T-55 (<2000 in storage) -           T-62 (2000 in storage) -           T-64 (2000 in storage) -           T-72 (2000 active duty, 8000 in storage) -           T-80 (2000 active duty, 5000 in storage) -           T-90 (350 active duty, 600  in storage) -           T-14 (20 in field testing) So how can you identify what type of a tank are you looking at? There are two features that can be used to distingu

The Hammer and the Sickle - Potential Russian Pincer-Offensive

For the past weeks the social media has been filled with sightings of Russian troops moving towards the regions bordering Ukraine. The buildup was initially called an exercise, but in the most recent press releases Kremlin has been rather clear that the troops have been deployed there as an operational deployment, if Russia feels a need to act upon any real or imaginary escalation in Donbass. The troops will stay in the region as long as President Putin sees it necessary. Russia Serna-Class landing crafts of the Caspian flotilla The initial buildup was focused on occupied Crimea that has so far received an additional VDV airborne regiment, multiple mechanized battalion tactical groups and heavy artillery units equipped with at least the enormous 240mm 2S4 Tulpan mortars.  Additional trains and convoys have been spotted in Rostov, Krasnodar and Voronezh regions. The Russian controlled Belarusian military has also been alerted and multiple, very Russian looking units are operating in the

Death from above – Russian ad hoc top attack defenses

T-72B3 tanks with crude top armor cages The recent Russian tank upgrade programs and the ever slower moving T-14 Armata saga, have all had significant portion of the efforts put into improving the survivability of the tank and its crew. Both static and explosive reactive armor (ERA) have been upgraded and small amount of the latest T-90M and T-72B3 tanks have active protection systems that may be able to defeat most of the anti-tank missiles and slower moving HEAT shells. Environmentally friendly T-90M While these programs have put some emphasis on the armor on the top of the turret, the main focus has been in the sides and the front of the hull and turret. Additional ERA elements have been mounted on the skirts of the vehicles and slat-cage type standoff armor has been attached into the rear sides of the turrets and hulls. These modifications however have very little effect on direct top attacks by modern anti-tank missiles such as the American Javelin, that is also in the