Skip to main content

Fiery Flowers: The New Russian Self Propelled Guns

Drok

The Russian army has relied on its Soviet-era artillery systems, that have been modernized with new communications and fire control equipment and refined ammunition. The only system that is currently under production is the very capable 152 mm MSTA-SM2, that is based on the chassis of the T-80 MBT. The biggest issue with MSTA-S variants is its complexity and weight. At 42 tons it has some logistical challenges and it’s not exactly cheap to manufacture either. Its proposed successor the T-90/Armata based 2S35 Koalitsiya-SV isn’t exactly cheaper, nor lighter.

SV-Koalitsiya on a T-90 chassis

The lighter and cheaper SPGs in Russian service, like the 152 mm 2S3 Akatsiya and 122 mm 2S1 Gvozdika are basically sixties technology and they have reached the end of their life-cycle. The Russian army has been painfully aware of this and there has been several programs to replace the ageing systems that bridge the gap between the mortars/122 mm towed guns and the top tier MSTA-S. 

The Russian army has finalized designs for three new artillery systems. These systems are supposed to be field tested and in limited service by 2021. Unlike the more ambitious programs like the Armata and Su-57, these SPGs are based on the automotive components of tried and tested vehicles, so the schedule might actually be realistic.

The smallest of the trio is the “Drok” or genista in English. It’s an 82 mm breech loading, turret mounted mortar on a 4x4 chassis. It’s primarily intended for the VDV airborne formations and it’s based on the Typhoon VDV wheeled IFV. The 82mm mortar, while short ranged, allows the VDV formations to have a true SPG that can also provide direct fire support against targets the 30mm autocannon armed Typhoon VDV and the BMD-series airborne IFVs aren’t very effective, such as strong-points. The currently used 82 mm towed Vasiliyek automatic mortar, while surprisingly powerful, lacks the tactical mobility of a 4x4 mounted system.

Phlox

The most interesting one of the troika is the “Phlox”, a 120 mm gun-mortar mounted on a Ural-4320 6x6 truck with an armored “crew cab”. capable of operating as both a mortar and a field gun out to 13000m with a fire rate of 10 rnds per minute. The Phlox is a cost efficient way to modernize the artillery batteries of the motorized rifle units with a SPG that can keep up with the BTR and Typhoon series IFVs and MRAPs. While the Phlox shares the look of the recent western truck mounted SPGs like the Archer and Caesar, it’s significantly less capable and lighter than the two.

The third one of the new flowers is the “Magnolia”, it will be a 120 mm gun/mortar similar to the Phlox but mounted on a Vityaz ATV. The tracked Vityaz has exceptional cross-country mobility, especially in the snow and marshlands. It’s also fully amphibious and thus well suited for the arctic units and the Russian Naval Infantry. 

The Magnolia can bring firepower to places other systems simply can’t. The prototype of the Magnolia seems to have a turret and it puts the system into another league when compared to the arctic ATV based mortar systems fielded by Finland and Sweden. The Finnish system for example is basically an 120 mm muzzle loading mortar in an open topped ATV.

Magnolia on a trailer

These systems will not be game changers. However, they allow the Russian forces to cost efficiently replace aging SPGs and towed systems with new SPGs that seamlessly integrate into the C3I systems of the Russian armed forces. They are also significantly less maintenance intensive than the Soviet era vehicles. The upgrade paths into Magnolia, Phlox and Drok are feasible and they offer both operational and economic improvements. 

Unlike the recent MBT and IFV upgrade programs that put emphasis into short term bang, the new artillery look like a part of a thought out long term development strategy.

https://rg.ru/2020/02/06/reg-pfo/geroj-rossii-ocenil-novye-samohodki-drok-floks-i-magnoliia.html
https://sputniknews.com/military/201609101045173202-phlox-howitzer-russia/

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fiery Hell in 1944: Soviet offensive against Finland

It has been 75 years since 1944 and memorial events for the various decisive battles are held across the world. One of the largest and most grueling battles was the Soviet summer offensive against Finland. Here is a short article about this less known campaign with lots of pictures to and a tiny bit of analysis. 

Karelian Isthmus in 8th of June 1944
The World War two had raged on for four years and the most pivotal moments of it had gone. German army was falling back on all fronts, Allied forces had landed to the shores of Normandy and the Soviet forces had dealt decisive blows to the German war machine.
While all this information was available at the headquarters of the Finnish army in Mikkeli, the Finnish army had grown complacent after spending the past two years in a stagnated trench warfare in the southern part of the frontline. The northern part of the front-lines had remained active, but the guerrilla warfare fought in the endless forests of the far north was worlds apart from the…
3 comments
Read more

Quick guide to identifying the Russian tanks Part 1: main platforms and T-72 variants

As most of the western nations have reduced their inventories to a few or mostly one type of main battle tank model in their active inventories, the myriad of tank platforms and distinct versions employed by the Russian armed forces may feel overwhelming. Here is a quick guide to identifying Russian MBTs. When you come across an image (or the actual thing), follow the steps to identify it properly.



Family of the tankRussian Armed Forces currently operates, or at least storage, the following tank platforms/families: -T-55 (<2000 in storage) -T-62 (2000 in storage) -T-64 (2000 in storage) -T-72 (2000 active duty, 8000 in storage) -T-80 (2000 active duty, 5000 in storage) -T-90 (350 active duty, 600 in storage) -T-14 (20 in field testing)
So how can you identify what type of a tank are you looking at?
There are two features that can be used to distinguishing the tank families: The roadwheel placement and the exhaust ports. The older and smaller T-55 and T-62 have five roadwheels in their suspe…
13 comments
Read more

T-90M ”Breakthrough” the Armata Russia has to live with

The T-14 Armata was supposedly going to be the next main combat vehicle platform that would replace the dozen or so main battle tank versions currently in the Russian service. The development and testing process of the T-14 has been difficult and the manufacturer Uralvagonzavod will deliver the first five pre-production vehicles in the first half of 2020. It’s quite a far cry from the originally planned production run of 2300 Armata’s by the end of 2020.

First newly-built T-90M tanks with redesigned turrets and engines will be delivered for state tests alongside the initial batch of T-14’s. The T-90M, that shouldn’t be confused with the export version upgrade package T-90MS, is actually very capable package with significantly less complicated problems than the more radical T-14.


The T-90M offers the same firepower and mobility with most likely slightly superior optics and situational awareness compared to the Armata. With the conventional layout, many of the camera, display and stabili…
1 comment
Read more