Skip to main content

Russian Paratroopers on the Waves


For the last three centuries the Naval Infantry was the sole force in Russia trained to conduct forced landings to seashores. In 2017 the Russian military reforms reached a point that more amphibious landing capable forces were needed. In a surprising moment of military insight, they begun training the VDV airborne forces to conduct amphibious landings on their own.
BTR-82A making a landfall

The 2017 test runs were followed up with joint exercises between the Naval Infantry and the VDV. The VDV brings some unique capabilities to the table, as it’s a service that is specialized in expeditionary operations. The combined air and naval landings also allow the Russian armed forces to move in significantly more men and machines that either of the branches could ferry on their own.

In the beginning of the February 2019 the Russian marines based in the occupied Ukrainian territory of Crimea conducted a routine landing drill to an unprepared beachhead. The Russian armed forces TV-channel provided an interesting insight into this exercise.
Mi-8 and VDV scouts

The combined arms operation included Mi-8 helicopters landing VDV scout squads to secure the beachhead. The Ka-52 attack helicopters and armed Mi-8 variants also provided over-watch for the operation.
Ropucha-class landing ship unloading BTR-82As
Alligator-class landing ship
A VDV BMD-2 unloading from a Ondatra-class landing craft

The initial landing force swam to shore from the Alligator- and Ropucha-class landing ships with the Naval Infantry BTR-82A infantry fighting vehicles. These spearhead platoons then moved further inland as the landing ships and smaller landing crafts begun to unload the rest of the naval infantry battalion and the supporting VDV formation.
2S1 SPGs

It’s also noteworthy that the landing force included organic self-propelled artillery in the form of 2S1 howitzer battery, that had landed before all of the infantry companies had reached the shore. This combined with the mortar units of the VDV allow a beachhead to support its push inland even without air support.
Go-fast goggles, BMD-2 and BAT-2

Even as the beachhead was still forming, the BAT-2 tracklayers were building a ramp from the beach to the higher ground to allow the flow of supply from the ships to the troops fighting inland.

Grisha V-class rear deck

An interesting part of the footage was also a Grisha-class corvette that provided close cover for the landing force with its 76 mm AK-176 and 30 mm AK-630 guns. The naval assets focused on defending the force from hostile UAVs trying to interfere with the landing.

While the video doesn’t clearly show the presence of main battle tanks, other sources revealed that the training operation was supported by the T-72B1 and T-72B3 tanks of the Crimean Naval Infantry.

Is this a game changing capability? Probably not. 

It does however tell that Russia still puts a high priority to amphibious operations, that are too large for the naval infantry alone. At the same time, the parachute battalions attached to the Naval Infantry brigades ae training to support VDV airborne landings if needed. 

There are viable targets for these types of operations from the Arctic islands, through the Baltic Sea all the way to the Ukrainian coastline. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Quick guide to identifying the Russian tanks Part 1: main platforms and T-72 variants

As most of the western nations have reduced their inventories to a few or mostly one type of main battle tank model in their active inventories, the myriad of tank platforms and distinct versions employed by the Russian armed forces may feel overwhelming. Here is a quick guide to identifying Russian MBTs. When you come across an image (or the actual thing), follow the steps to identify it properly. Family of the tank Russian Armed Forces currently operates, or at least storage, the following tank platforms/families: -           T-55 (<2000 in storage) -           T-62 (2000 in storage) -           T-64 (2000 in storage) -           T-72 (2000 active duty, 8000 in storage) -           T-80 (2000 active duty, 5000 in storage) -           T-90 (350 active duty, 600  in storage) -           T-14 (20 in field testing) So how can you identify what type of a tank are you looking at? There are two features that can be used to distingu

The Hammer and the Sickle - Potential Russian Pincer-Offensive

For the past weeks the social media has been filled with sightings of Russian troops moving towards the regions bordering Ukraine. The buildup was initially called an exercise, but in the most recent press releases Kremlin has been rather clear that the troops have been deployed there as an operational deployment, if Russia feels a need to act upon any real or imaginary escalation in Donbass. The troops will stay in the region as long as President Putin sees it necessary. Russia Serna-Class landing crafts of the Caspian flotilla The initial buildup was focused on occupied Crimea that has so far received an additional VDV airborne regiment, multiple mechanized battalion tactical groups and heavy artillery units equipped with at least the enormous 240mm 2S4 Tulpan mortars.  Additional trains and convoys have been spotted in Rostov, Krasnodar and Voronezh regions. The Russian controlled Belarusian military has also been alerted and multiple, very Russian looking units are operating in the

Energy deal ties Finland to the Russian Nord Stream 2

A Finnish energy company Fortum has been negotiating with the German E.ON to buy a German energy company called Uniper. The deal has been controversial in Finland as it would include a large number of coal fired power plants that do not fit the Fortum’s strategy of becoming a sustainable and green energy producer. As 50,8 % of Fortum is owned by the Finnish government, the deal has an obvious political angle. (Photo: Nord Stream) The most disturbing aspect of the deal is that Uniper owns a 950 Million € share of the Russo-German gas pipeline project Nord Stream 2 . The Finnish minister responsible for directing the state owned companies is the Center Party’s Mika Lintilä. He stated that he didn’t have any information about the Uniper’s share of the gas pipeline. He also stated that the Finnish government would not veto the deal even if it would link Finland to the controversial pipeline and Russian geopolitical interests. Finland, unlike the Baltic States and Sweden,