Skip to main content

Coup could lead to a Russo-Turkish alliance

Coup could lead to a Russo-Turkish alliance

Coup attempt in Turkey dominated the headlines over the weekend. President Erdogans AK-party defeated the coup with well-rehearsed police operations and rapid mobilization of the rank and file members of the party.
As was to be expected Erdogan began rapid purges in the military. What surprised some western observers was the speed and ferocity of the purges as they spread from the actual coup participants to the police and justice system.
As of now over 2000 judges, 6000 soldiers, 100 generals and 15000 policemen have been either detained or sacked. Erdogan is conducting an all-out purge in the nation. The end result will be an extremely authoritarian Turkey that will have ever stricter Islamic justice. These purges combined with the probable introduction of the death penalty will spell an end to the Turkeys bid for EU membership.
Erdogan has also clearly stated that he will not seek support from his NATO allies nor USA. His impossible demands towards the Obama administration and besieging of the US forces in Incirlik airbase are clear indications that Turkey will alienate itself from the west. In the light of the coming Islamic influences and authoritarian regime will inevitably cause the breakdown of the NATO-Turkey relationship.
Turkey is not content on standing alone, as Erdogan has expressed clear intentions to forge closer ties with Putins authoritarian regime. The two leaders have common interests in Syria and both seek to fortify their power. Immediately after the coup attempt, Putins ideological idol Alexandr Dugin visited Turkey and met with several AK-party ministers. Putin is also going to visit Erdogan on August.
If Russia and Turkey manage to find enough common ground to form an alliance or at the very least non-aggression pact, it could spell disaster to those nations that currently are under pressure. Most obvious are Georgia, that Russia partly occupies and the Kurds that are under constant assault by the Erdogan regime.
Security threats may spread a lot further than that. By allying with Turkey, Russia gains several advantages. It will no longer have to worry about NATO on its southern flank. This will allow Russia to move from 4 to 6 motorized infantry brigades from the southern regions into other theaters of operation. Russo-Turkish alliance would also de-facto rule the black sea, allowing Russia to operate against Ukraine more freely.
Turkey straying away from the NATO would be a major crisis for the alliance. It would also strip away one of the largest military forces from the alliance. These losses combined with the sluggish decision making in the western democracies would leave to a lengthened window of opportunity for Russian military operations against Ukraine or NATO members like Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Naturally also neutral countries like Finland and Sweden are at risk.
One additional concern are the 3.1 million refugees and migrants in Turkey. Russia experimented with hybrid warfare against Finland last fall. Russia forced Finland to sign a new bilateral border agreement after Finland received large numbers of illegal immigrants from Russia that applied for asylum. We could see Russia and Turkey destabilizing Europe with a new wave of mass migration. This would further tie down the miniscule NATO forces present in the Western Europe.
USA is heading divided into a heated presidential election and Olympic Games are starting in Rio (Russia invaded Georgia during Olympics.) There is no shortage of opportunities if the Russian leadership is looking to rebuild its former glory by arms or subterfuge.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Quick guide to identifying the Russian tanks Part 1: Updated Dec. 2021

  As most of the western nations have reduced their inventories to a few or mostly one type of main battle tank model in their active inventories, the myriad of tank platforms and distinct versions employed by the Russian armed forces may feel overwhelming. Here is a quick guide to identifying Russian MBTs. When you come across an image (or the actual thing), follow the steps to identify it properly. Updated 15.12.2021: T-90 modifications Family of the tank Russian Armed Forces currently operates, or at least storage, the following tank platforms/families: -            T-55 (<2000 in storage) -            T-62 (2000 in storage) -            T-64 (2000 in storage) -            T-72 (2000 active duty, 8000 in storage) -            T-80 (2000 active duty, 5000 in storage) -            T-90 (350 active duty, 600  in storage) -            T-14 (20 in field testing) So how can you identify what type of a tank are you looking at? There are two features that can be used to distinguishing th
80 comments
Read more

Death from above – Russian ad hoc top attack defenses

T-72B3 tanks with crude top armor cages The recent Russian tank upgrade programs and the ever slower moving T-14 Armata saga, have all had significant portion of the efforts put into improving the survivability of the tank and its crew. Both static and explosive reactive armor (ERA) have been upgraded and small amount of the latest T-90M and T-72B3 tanks have active protection systems that may be able to defeat most of the anti-tank missiles and slower moving HEAT shells. Environmentally friendly T-90M While these programs have put some emphasis on the armor on the top of the turret, the main focus has been in the sides and the front of the hull and turret. Additional ERA elements have been mounted on the skirts of the vehicles and slat-cage type standoff armor has been attached into the rear sides of the turrets and hulls. These modifications however have very little effect on direct top attacks by modern anti-tank missiles such as the American Javelin, that is also in the
Read more

Russian Buildup: Critical elements point towards war

Russian T-72B3 obr 2016 tanks near Ukraine For well over a decade, Russia has been actively building a capability to turn large training exercises into offensive military operations to minimize the suspicions of the buildup. This strategy was successfully employed in 2014 when Russian army occupied Crimea from Ukraine. The same type of maskirovka , or deception, was also used multiple times by the USSR. During the massive Zapad 2017 exercise many western experts and pundits, myself included, were very worried that Russia would use it as a cover to stage an attack against Ukraine or even the Baltic states. Before Zapad 2017 I wrote a short checklist titled "To worry or not": Tweet from 2017 The list isn't comprehensive, but the Russian buildup during the January 2022 ticks all other boxes from that list, with the exception of Air Force assets being deployed to road bases, but that isn't strictly necessary given the availability of runways in the regions surrounding Ukr
Read more